Layout
- Nine times the cell count of 3×3
- Nine rows create much smaller cells than the introductory layout
9×9 Schulte Table
An 81-target task for a long sequence where small targets, device scale, and total task length dominate interpretation.
Your Time
0.00s
Next
1
Click 1
Task facts
- Number range
- 1–81
- Cells
- 81
- Ordered selections
- 81
Complete this grid
- 1
Select Start and wait for the shuffled grid.
- 2
Select 1 through 81 in ascending order.
- 3
Review completion time and incorrect selections together.
- 4
Repeat only with the same setup when you want a personal comparison.
What is specific to 9×9
An 81-target task for a long sequence where small targets, device scale, and total task length dominate interpretation.
Small-screen behavior
- A phone can technically fit the grid while still producing impractical physical targets
- Zoom changes both label size and the grid's footprint
Mouse and touch
- Long pointer sequences make interruptions and hand position more relevant
- Accidental neighboring taps are more likely when the target is physically small
Readability
- Use only when every two-digit label remains distinguishable without strain
Printing
- Prefer one grid per page and verify the actual print scale before recording a paper result
How to compare this size
- The 9-to-81 contrast with 3×3 illustrates why total time cannot represent ability across sizes
- Keep errors and interruptions beside every long-grid time
Choosing a neighboring size
Choose 8×8 for seventeen fewer targets and a less compressed layout.
Use 10×10 only when the full 1–100 sequence and maximum site density are intentional.
Your comparison context
These values come only from completed ascending rounds stored in this browser for this exact grid. Choose an input method to narrow the set.
No comparable attempts are stored yet. Complete several rounds with the same grid, device, input method, and rules before interpreting changes in your own history.
Device model, orientation, browser zoom, and display scale are not stored. Confirm those conditions yourself before treating two rows as like-for-like.
Continue with a known comparison context
Use the tracker for filters and medians, or read why total times from different conditions should stay separate.